Thursday, January 12, 2012

UNMANNED TEXAS BORDER CROSSING AT BIG BEND

Two or three years ago, Ted Poe was on a tour of the SW border area (south of El Paso about 30 miles). There were some narrow metal bridges crossing the river and he threw a fit about those and I believe they were removed.


Now they want to open up this crossing again. Ever since this crossing was closed, the people (on both sides of the river in this area) have been complaining about having to travel 16 hours to get across. Apparently someone complained enough to get this opened up again. Bill Brooks, the public information officer at the BP Big Bend Sector (formerly called the Marfa Sector), is in favor of opening this crossing as are others. I think they have been talked into opening this crossing because of the remaining population of the little village on the other side and the hardships of those living there. Those Mexicans made their meager living on the tourists that would cross over and eat and buy handmade Mexican items and they would come across to the U.S. side to buy groceries.

Ordinarily the BP would not be allowed to patrol on National Park land...but the House Committee on Natural Resources passed H.R. 1505: National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act in October that has given the BP authority to patrol on NP land (within 100 miles of the border). Conservationists were not happy about it and complained about it being a form of government "land grabbing" and would cause a lot of damage to the parks...but apparently they haven't been to the borders in AZ and witnessed the tons of trash and garbage left by the illegals and smugglers!! I guess the Big Bend BP want to take advantage of this access to park land before the government changes its mind!!

I feel like a lot of others....that this is just going to open up another can of worms for the smugglers...and make it easier for the poor Mexicans to slip across with "a card" and then disappear into the U.S. like millions of others. The Mexicans have been coming across in this area for many years when the river is low enough to wade or walk across....which is probably dry now because of the drought. I believe the river between El Paso and Presidio is still being used by the smugglers....although it may have slowed down some after more and better armed agents were brought in.

I sent the article on this "plan" to Cornyn, AG Greg Abbott, our federal and state reps and senators. I would suggest contacting Perry's office and complaining about this. Since he is running for president...he will be more inclined to listen if he thinks he can get our support. He has been sounding very strong about securing the borders....and this would be a good time to complain to him about the crossing. The $2.3 million cost alone during a bad economy should be enough not to open it.

The Park Service started work on this facility the end of October and are saying it should be completed by spring (unless their plans are "changed")....so they are already building it. While it may be too late to stop the initial construction....complaints can be sent to:

William E. Wellman
Big Bend National Park Superintendent.
Big Bend National Park
P.O. Box 129
Big Bend National Park, TX 79834

Headquarters & Visitor Information
432-477-2251
432-477-1175 FAX
E-mail contact form at:
www.nps.gov/bibe/index.htm

John J. Smietana, Jr. is the Chief Patrol Agent at the Border Patrol Big Bend Sector (formerly called the Marfa Sector) in Marfa, TX, and can be reached at:


(432) 729-5200 or 1-888-536-6204

Bill Brooks is the public information officer for the BP Big Bend Sector and can be reached at: (432) 729-5200 or 1-888-536-6204

Mailing address:
Big Bend Border Patrol Sector
P.O. Box I
Marfa, TX 79843

From Pat Kennedy, WTCCC, Midland via e-mail


Read article here.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am from the Big Bend area and I know for certain that Big Bend National Park, specifically the Boquillas crossing, is about 375 miles away from El Paso, not 30. The area is an unforgiving desert, which is a smuggler's nightmare, consisting of canyons, mountians, lack of water, and desert climate. This area also has THE lowest number of illegal crossings in the U.S., which is probably due to the reasons I listed above. Brewster County itself has one of the lowest crime rates in the country. I understand your concern, but one will not find organized street gangs in the middle of the desert. I am looking forward to the re-opening of Boquillas crossing because I will be able to not only visit Big Bend NP of course, but to visit the two Mexican National Parks, especially the Del Carmens, that border Big Bend National Park.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the anonymous posting on 1-16-12. To add to the comment, there never were any narrow medal bridges. You had to either wade across the Rio or take a boat ride with the very friendly people from Boquillas in Mexico and then either ride up the trail on a donkey or hitch a ride in an old pick up truck. Closing the border took away the only income the residence in Boquillas were making. I too am looking forward to the re-opening of the crossing so I can visit the many friends myself & my family have gotten to know in the last 25 years. I hope to be among the first!

Anonymous said...

Damn funny I saw the metal bridge in a PBS special report that a Deputy took a reporter with his camera gear and the deputy carried his car-15. It was several miles from the nearest town and was unmaned. Why is the government spending tax dollars to facillitate the illegals an unguarded entry point into the U.S.A. This was on tv and was eye opening. So you can try to convince someone else they don't exist.

Anonymous said...

After visiting as a camper in Big Bend, I talked with many locals (from Marathon, Alpine, Terlingua) who had great memories of rowing or biking to Boquillas and other nearby Mexican towns. They spoke of friendly relationships with the Mexicans and zero border violence or drug smuggling. I think that reopening the border here (with BP stationed outside the park) would increase the cultural experience of campers and be good for the local economy, with no significant criminal or immigration issues.